Usporedba modeliranja i animiranja u 3DS Maxu i Blenderu

master's thesis

• Author: Mihajlo Knežević
• Mentor: Sanja Bjelovučić Kopilović (mentor)
• Committee member: Tibor Skala (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Sanja Bjelovučić Kopilović (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Miroslav Mikota (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Graphic Arts; Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2016-9-30, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: TECHNICAL SCIENCES; Graphic Technology

Abstract

U ovom diplomskom radu su uspoređena dva softvera (3ds Max i Blender) za 3D

grafiku i animaciju s obzirom na izradu i animiranje 3D humanoidnog modela. Kroz

faze modeliranja, teksturiranja, postavljanja kostura za animaciju i samog animiranja

dan je uvid u sličnosti načina rada u softverima zbog čega je omogućena usporedba.

Faze su relativno detaljno opisane i potom uspoređene s obzirom na prednosti i mane

alata koji su korišteni i utrošeno vrijeme izrade. Cilj je bio pokazati da li besplatno softversko

rješenje može odraditi posao kao i komercijalni softver u zadatku izrade i animiranja

3D humanoidnog lika.

Rezultati su pokazali da besplatni sofver Blender može pratiti komercijalni softver 3ds

Max u poslu izrade i animiranja 3D humanoidnog modela. U nekim fazama rada

Blender je bio bolji izbor jer je brže dobiven finalni proizvod dok je u nekim fazama bio

sporiji. Alati modeliranja, teksturiranja i dodavanja vlasi su se pokazali kao odličan izbor,

dok su alati ostalih faza rada pokazali dobre rezultate, ali nešto slabije od 3ds

Maxa. Blender je sveukupno pokazao da vremenski i kvalitetom prikaza može konkurirati

3ds Maxu u ovom konkretnom zadatku.

Abstract (english)

In this thesis two software (3D Studio Max and Blender) for 3D graphics and animation

are compared with regard to creating and animating 3D humanoid model. Through the

stages of modeling, texturing, setting skeleton for animation and the animation itself an

insight is given into the similarities of working methods for software. This enabled comparison

of software. The stages are relatively explained in detail and then compared in

view of the advantages and disadvantages of tools that are used and also in view of the

time spent. The aim was to show whether free software solution can do the job as well

as commercial software in the task of creating and animating 3D humanoid figure.

The results showed that free software Blender can follow commercial software 3ds Max

in the process of making and animating 3D humanoid model. In some stages Blender

was a better choice because it quickly obtained final product while in some stages was

slower. Tools for modeling, texturing and adding hair proved to be a great choice while

the tools of other phases of work have shown good results, but something less than 3ds

Max. Overall, Blender proved that its working time and the display quality can compete

with 3ds Max in this particular task.

• Keywords: 3D modeliranje; animacija; simulacija; biomehanika
• Keywords (english): 3D modeling; animation; simulation; biomechanics
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:216:081947
• Study programme: Title: Graphic technology; specializations in: Graphic technology, Design of graphic products; Course: Graphic technology; Study programme type: university; Study level: graduate; Academic / professional title: sveučilišni/a magistar/magistra inženjer/inženjerka grafičke tehnologije (sveučilišni/a magistar/magistra inženjer/inženjerka grafičke tehnologije)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Closed access
• Created on: 2024-04-18 21:39:30